Part Three:
"CLASS STRUGGLES IN CHINA"
A MARXIST-LENINIST ANALYSIS OF MAO-TSE TUNG, BY W.B.BLAND
CHAPTER TWELVE : THE 'AGRICULTURE
FIRST' POLICY
(Summer 1960 - September
1962)
Introduction
COMPELLED TO BRING
THE 'GREAT LEAP FORWARD' TO AN END, THE COMPRADOR BOURGEOIS
GROUPING OF THE PARTY NEVERTHELESS SUCCESSFULLY
UTILISED THE AGRICULTURAL CHAOS CAUSED BY THE 'LEAP'
TO IMPOSE ON THE PARTY FOR A TIME -
A POLICY OF ACCORDING THE PRIORITY
TO AGRICULTURE.
The Peitaiho Central
Work Conference (summer 1960)
In the summer
of 1960, a Central Work Conference was convened
at Peitaiho, attended by all provincial Party First Secretaries.
The proceedings of the conference were not made public, but subsequent
events indicated that it:
"Decided to change drastically
the priorities of economic policy -- above
all by mobilising available resources to
support agriculture. . . . After the work conference,
the shift towards an 'agriculture-first' policy became clearly discernible".
(Parris H. Chang: op. cit.;
p. 126).
The 9th Plenum of the 8th CC
(January 1961)
This policy was confirmed
at the 9th Plenum of the 8th CC, in January 1961, which:
"Decided to reinforce
the agricultural front by making agriculture the
foundation of the national economy and giving industry second priority".
(Edward L. Wheelwright &
Bruce McFarlane: op. cit.; p. 68).
The Plenum declared that:
"Since there had
been tremendous development in heavy industry in
the last three years . . . the scale
of the basic construction industries should therefore be appropriately
reduced".
(Li Choh-ming: 'China's
Industrial Development: 1958-63' (hereafter listed as
'Li Shoh-ming (1972)), in: Roderick MacFarquahar (Ed.) 'China
under Mao: Politics takes Command: A Selection
of Articles from "The China Quarterly"'; Cambridge (USA); 1972.;
p. 182).
and reaffirmed the call for a movement
of:
"All the Party and all people
to agriculture and food grains."
(Resolution of 9th Plenum of
8th CC, in: Li Choh-ming (1972): ibid.; p. 182).
70 Articles of Industrial Policy
(December 1961)
In December 1961:
"The Party issued secretly to
the cadres in the field a document known as '70 Articles of Industrial
Policy'. In essence, it directed that, unless
special authority was given, all basic construction should be suspended,
all those enterprises that had been operating regularly at a loss
be shut down, and the practice of recruiting labour from rural areas
be abandoned for at least three years."
(Li Shoh-ming (1972): ibid.;
p. 182-83).
The 10th Plenum of the 8th CC (September
1962) The 10th Plenum of the 8th CC in September 1962 resolved that:
"As the immediate urgent task
of the people, the development of agriculture, itself the foundation
of the national economy . . . must be given the topmost position".
(Resolution of 10th Plenum of
8th CC (September 1962), in: Li Shoh-ming (1972): ibid.; p.
183-84).
CHAPTER THIRTEEN : THE 'SOCIALIST
EDUCATION MOVEMENT' (September 1962 - April 1966)
Introduction
THE 'SOCIALIST
EDUCATION MOVEMENT' WAS A MOVEMENT INITIATED BY
THE
COMPRADOR BOURGEOIS
GROUPING WITHIN THE PARTY LEADERSHIP WHICH AIMED
AT MOBILISING THE POOR AND LOWER-MIDDLE PEASANTS
IN COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY STRUGGLE AGAINST THE NATIONAL BOURGEOISIE.
The 10th Plenum of the 8th
CC (September 1962)
By the time of the 10th
Plenum of the 8th CC, in September 1962:
"China's internal political
and economic situation was just beginning to improve following three years
of severe crop failures and a series of emergency administrative
retrenchments made necessary by the collapse of the Great Leap Forward".
(Richard Baum: 'Prelude
to Revolution: Mao, the Party and the Peasant Question:
1962-66' (hereafter listed as 'Richard Baum (1975); New York; 1975;
p. 11).
At the Plenum:
"Mao Tse-tung put forward the
slogan 'Never forget the class struggle"'.
(John Gittings (1968):
op. cit.; p. 271).
which was, of course, a call
for class struggle against the national bourgeoisie.
The most important decision taken
by the Plenum was to set up:
"A mass movement called the
Socialist Education Movement. The aim of this movement
was . . to counter all moves towards
an individualistic economy . . . and generally
to raise the socialist consciousness of the whole people by bringing
about mass participation in the struggle and relating Mao Tse-tung's works
to it."
(John & Elsie Collier: op.
cit.; p. 58).
"The Socialist Education
Movement of 1962-66 . . . was not just directed
at 'capitalist' attitudes in the countryside. . . . It was also concerned
with institutional arrangements which might contribute
to capitalist' relations".
(Dennis Woodward: "'Two Line
Struggle" in Agriculture', in: Bill Brugger (Ed.): op. cit.; p. 153).
The official aim of the Socialist
Education Movement' was:
"To rectify the four 'uncleans'
in rural administration (lack of political discipline, ideological
deviations, organisational deviations and the mismanagement of economic
affairs) and thus became popularly known as the . . . 'Four
Clean-ups Movement'".
(David & Nancy D. Milton:
op. cit.; p. 71).
but it:
"In addition to stressing 'class
struggle' was increasingly identified with the Thought of Mao Tse-tung".
(William F. Dorrill:
'Power, Policy and Ideology in the Making of the Chinese Cultural
Revolution', in: Thomas W. Robinson (Ed.): 'The Cultural Revolution in
China'; Berkeley (USA): 1971; p. 56).
The Socialist Education Movement
(SEM) (or Campaign) (SEC) must be regarded as a:
"Rehearsal of the 'Cultural
Revolution."
(Alam Chamsul: 'A Critique
of China's Cultural Revolution (1966-76)'; Calcutta; 1980; p. 5).
and by February 1963, it:
"Was well under way in many
provinces".
(Parris H. Chang: ibid.; p.
148).
The Two Lines within the SEM
From the outset, however,
"Within the Socialist Education
Movement there developed two opposed policies".
(John & Elsie Collier: op.
cit.; p. 59).
and a:
"Great struggle between
the representatives of the 'two roads"'.
(David & Nancy D. Milton:
op. cit.; p. 75).
The national bourgeois grouping
within the Party:
"Continued to stress not politics
but production, . . . not class struggle but technical reform",
(Richard Baum (1975): op. cit.;
p. 20).
while the comprador bourgeois grouping
within the Party sought to utilise it to mobilise masses of the peasantry
into class struggle,
that is, into counter-revolutionary
action against the national bourgeoisie
and its political representatives.
As a result of the opposition
of the political representatives of the national bourgeoisie to Mao's 'class
struggle' aims for the SEM, up to February 1963:
"Party functionaries at the
intermediate and lower levels dragged their feet in implementing
the new campaign",
(Richard Baum (1975): ibid.;
p. 19).
and as a result:
"The SEC was relatively lifeless".
(Parris H. Chang: op. cit.;
p. 148).
The Central Work Conference (February
1963)
In a speech to a Central
Work Conference in February 1963, in an effort to put the SEC on what he
regarded as:
". . the correct course, Mao
intervened",
(Parris H. Chang: ibid.; p.
149).
and:
"Revealed the extraordinary
political significance he attached to the new movement:
'How can we achieve socialist
construction when there is peaceful coexistence in politics?
. . . Once we grasp class struggle, miracles are possible'".
(Richard Baum (1975): op. cit.;
p. 17).
Mao's 'Note on Seven Well-written
Documents' (May 1963)
In May 1963,
Mao issued 'Note on Seven Well-written Documents of the Chekiang
Provincial Committee concerning Cadre Participation
in Physical Labour', in which he warned that, without class struggle:
"The day would not be far off
. . . before a counter revolutionary restoration
on a nation-wide scale would inevitably occur.
The whole of China would then
change colour. . . . Isn't that a most dangerous prospect?"
(Mao Tse-tung: 'Note
on Seven Well-written Documents of the Chekiang Provincial
Committee concerning Cadre Participation in Physical Labour'; (May
1963), in: Richard Baum (1975): ibid.; p. 22).
Mao's 'First Ten Points'
(May 1963)
In May 1963:
"The Chairman's growing
displeasure . . . was clearly manifested
. . . when the Central Committee, acting under Mao's personal supervision,
promulgated a 'Draft Directive on Some Problems in Current Rural
Work'. Known in Maoist parlance as the 'First Ten Points',
this directive served notice to Party officials throughout the
country that their superficial, perfunctory and lackadaisical
attitudes towards class struggle would no longer be tolerated".
(Richard Baum (1975): ibid.;
p. 21).
This document was:
"The first major policy directive
concerning the SEC and was clearly intended by Mao to guide the campaign
along the course he desired".
(Parris H. Chang: op. cit.;
p. 149).
Its most important feature
was that:
"Those cadres who had failed
to emphasise the class struggle or had paid insufficient attention to the
class struggle phenomena were criticised".
(Parris H. Chang: ibid.; p.
149).
For example, Article 4 declared:
"Not all of our comrades
have paid attention to the various phenomena of class struggle. .
. Many have failed to observe these phenomena and have not given them the
serious thought required. Instead they adopt an attitude of
indifference, thereby letting the phenomena continue to develop".
('Draft Directive on Some Problems
in Current Rural Work' (May 1963), in: Richard Baum (1975): op. cit.; p.
21).
The 'First Ten Points':
"Held that cadre corruption
. . . was the most prevalent cause of peasant dissatifaction with the existing
rural leadership".
(Richard Baum (1975): ibid.;
p. 24).
and that this
must be corrected by mobilising the masses of the poor
and middle peasants against the 'forces of corruption':
In other words, the 'First Ten
Points':
"Called for the revitalisation
of long-dormant poor and lower middle peasants' organisations
in the countryside, The poor and lower-middle peasants,
who reportedly constituted some 65% to 70% of China's total rural
population, . . . were now instructed to form a 'class army' to do
battle against the forces of corruption and reaction in the countryside".
(Richard Baum (1975):
ibid.; p. 24).
The 'First Ten Points' declared:
"During the course of the movement,
the masses must be given every opportunity to fully air their views,
make criticism of errors and shortcomings, and expose evil people and evil
deeds".
('Draft Directive on Some Problems
in Current Rural Work' (May 1963), in: Richard Baum (1975): ibid.; p. 24).
Because of opposition from
the political representatives of the national bourgeoisie, Mao's 'First
Ten Points' were only:
"Officially adopted by the Central
Committee at its 11th Plenum in August 1966, when the Cultural Revolution
was in full blood. It took 38 months for these ideas to be
accepted by the majority of the Party's highest body".
(Jean Esmein: 'The Chinese Cultural
Revolution'; London; 1975; p. 44).
The 'Second Ten Points' (September
1963)
In September
1963, four months after the issuing of the 'First
Ten Points', the leaders of the national bourgeois
grouping within the Party succeeded in getting the Central
Committee to issue:
"Another directive on
the SEC, 'Some Concrete Policy Formulations of the CC of the CPC
in the Rural Socialist Education Movement' (also known as the 'Second Ten
Points')". (Parris H. Chang: op. cit.; p. 150).
They:
"Were drafted on the basis of
a report . . . by Peking Party boss, Peng Chen".
(Richard Baum (1975): op. cit.;
p. 43).
Later, during the
'Cultural Revolution', the 'Second Ten Points
were attributed:
"If not to Liu Shao-chi personally,
at least to Liu's thought".
(David & Mancy D. Milton:
op. cit.; p. 71).
The 'Second Ten Points' essentially
reversed the political line of Mao's 'First Ten Points;
"The 'Second Ten Points' substantially
modified the spirit and softened the impact of the SEC as set forth in
its predecessor."
(Parris H. Chang: op. cit.;
p. 150).
"Reliance in the movement
should be placed, the revised 'Ten Points' stated, not on the poor
and lower-middle peasants, but on the Party leadership".
(David & Nancy D. Milton:
ibid.; p. 71).
Thus:
"The net effect of both the
'Second Ten Points' and the ensuing propaganda campaign in the mass
media was to ensure that the Socialist Education Movement would
be a relativly low-key affair."
(Richard Baum (1975): op. cit.;
p. 63).
Mao's 'Twenty-three Articles'
(December 1964)
In December 1964, the
comprador bourgeois grouping within the Party struck back with the issue
of:
"A new directive 'Some Problems
currently arising in the Course of the Rural Socialist Education
Movement' (also known as the' TwentyThree Points',
which was said to have been drafted under Mao's personal guidance)".
(Parris H. Chang: op. cit.;
p. 156).
The document re-defined:
"The Socialist Education
Movement as a movement meant to confront the 'contradiction between socialism
and capitalism in China's countryside'. In order to accomplish
this, it called once again on the peasant masses to supervise the
Party cadres by their criticism and, for the first time, there appeared
the formulation that was to be the central political focus of the Cultural
Revolution -- to direct the 'spearhead of criticism against
'those people in authority within the Party who take the capitalist road"'.
(David & Nancy D. Milton:
op. cit.; p. 71-72).
It attempted to make the new line
final and definitive by declaring:
"If the present document
should contradict previous Central Committee documents concerning the Socialist
Education Movement, then this document shall uniformly be regarded as the
standard".
(CC, CPC: 'Some
Problems currently arising in the Course of the Rural Socialist Education
Movement' (January 1965), in: Richard Baum (1975): op.
cit.; p. 127).
During the Socialist Education Movement:
"Lin Piao rose to ideological
prominence";
(Roxane Witke: op. cit.; p.
375).
and:
"Chiang Ching, .
. . after two decades of isolation, . began her return."
(Roxane Witke: ibid.; p. 306).
Conclusion
In April 1966:
"Mao study was incorporated
into the Socialist Education Movement on a regular and nation-wide
basis".
(Richard Baum: 'The Cultural
Revolution in the Countryside: Anatomy of a Limited Rebellion'(hereafter
listed as 'Richard Baum (1971)', in: Thomas W. Robinson (Ed.):
'The Cultural Revolution in China'; Berkeley (USA); 1971; p.
376).
and was associated with:
"The initiation of the Cultural
Revolution".
(Richard Baum (1971): ibid.;
p. 376).
So that the Socialist Education
Movement:
"Overlapped the Cultural Revolution
and virtually merged with it in the autumn of 1966". (John & Elsie
Collier: op. cit.; p. 62).
The ritual study of 'The Thought
of Mao Tse-tung' was common to both the 'Socialist Education Movement'
and the 'Cultural Revolution':
"Mao-study was the common element
of both the (urban) Cultural Revolution and the (rural) Socialist Education
Movement."
(Richard Baum (1971): op. cit.;
p. 376).
Indeed, the Socialist Education
Movement may justly be regarded as:
"Mao's test run"
(David & Nancy D. Milton:
op. cit.; p. 127).
for the 'Great Proletarian Cultural
Revolution' of 1966-69.
CHAPTER FOURTEEN : PRELUDE
TO THE 'CULTURAL REVOLUTION' (September 1962 -
April 1966)
The 10th Plenum of the 8th
CC (September/October 1962)
The
10th Plenum of the 8th CC was held in September/October
1962. Although:
"Mao presided over this meeting";
(Kenneth Lieberthal:
'The Great Leap Forward and the Split in the Yenan Leadership'
(hereafter listed as 'Kenneth Lieberthal (1987)'), in: Roderick MacFarquahar
& John K. Fairbank (Eds.): 'The Cambridge History of China',
Volume 14: 'The People's Republic, Part 1: The Emergence of
Revolutionary China'; Cambridge; 1987; p. 334).
and, as has been said:
"put forward the slogan 'Never
forget the class struggle!".
(Mao Tse-tung: Speech
at 10th Plenum of 8th CC (September/October 1962), in: John
Gittings (1968): op. cit.; p. 271).
this policy was not endorsed by
the Plenum, and:
"In the months that followed,
precious time slipped by while the Secretariat of the Central Committee
appeared to do nothing".
(Jean Esmein: op. cit.; p. 44).
The Initiation of the 'Learn
from the PLA' Campaign (December 1963)
In December 1963,
"Mao issued a general call for
people to 'learn from the PLA', a startling slogan".
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
op. cit.; p. 338).
In this period,
"The PLA generated several
models of political rectitude including a selfless soldier (LEI Feng*)".
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
op. cit.; p. 338).
Lei Feng:
"Was a peasant soldier from
Hunan province who was held up by Mao Tse-tung to be youthful paragon of
Maoist virtues. . . . These virtues
included courage, humility, sacrifice . .
. and above all unquestioned loyalty".
(Edwin P-w. Leung: op. cit.;
p. 205).
He:
Chiang Ching and 'Cultural Reform'
(January 1964)
By 1962, Chiang Ching had convinced
Mao:
"That the cultural sphere needed
attention".
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
op. cit.; p. 343).
and in January 1964, with Mao's
support, she was able to put into practice:
"Her plans to revolutionise
Peking Opera and other aspects of Chinese culture."
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
ibid.; p. 343).
However, being under the control
of the national bourgeois grouping of the Party leadership,
"the Ministries of Culture and
Education and the Propaganda Department of the CPC . . . paid her no heed
and scoffed at her efforts."
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
ibid.; p. 345-46).
In this situation Chiang Ching linked
up with other pseudo-left opposition elements -- such as KANG Sheng*, who
"Heavily and personally involved
himself in Chiang Ching 's efforts to revolutionise Peking Opera",
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
ibid.; p. 345).
CHANG Chun-chiao*,
"Who was in the cultural apparatus
in Shanghai",
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
ibid.; p. 345).
YAO Wen-yuan*,
"a Shanghai critic".
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
ibid.; p. 345). ;
and, above all, Minister of Defence
Lin Piao.
In June/July 1964,
" . . clashes occurred
at . . . the . . . Festival of Peking Opera on Contemporary Themes";
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987): ibid.; p. 346).
In February 1966,
". . Lin Piao and Chiang
Ching were clearly linked up when Lin invited Chiang to stage a 'Forum
on Literature and Art for Troops' and made her the official cultural adviser
to the military. This for the first time gave Chiang an official position
that she could use as a base for pursuing her political goals".
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
ibid.; p. 342).
The forum:
"Directly challenged the policies
of Peng Chen, Lu Ting-yi and others".
(Frederick C.
Teiwes & Warren Sun: 'The Tragedy
of Lin Piao: Riding the Tiger during the Cultural Revolution:
1966-1971'; London; 1996; p. 57).
The Establishment of the Five-Man
Group for Cultural Reform (June 1964)
In June 1964,
"the Party Secretariat formed
a Five-Man Group to coordinate efforts toward Cultural Reform.
Peng Chen . . . took charge of the group".
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
ibid.; p. 346).
The Publication of the 'Little
Red Book' (May 1965)
In May 1965:
"The army .
. compiled the little red book of Mao quotations";
(David Milton, Nancy Milton
& Franz Schurmann (Eds.): 'People's China: Social Experimentation,
Politics, Entry onto the World Scene: 1966
through 1972'; New York; 1974; p. 225).
The Removal of Lo Jui-ching
(September 1965)
LO Jui-ching* had
been appointed Chief-of-Staff of the PLA in April 1959, at the time of
the ousting of Peng Teh-huai, and:
"Over the course of time,
Lo came to adopt views similar to those of Peng".
(Lois D.Tretiak:
'Revolt of the Generals', in: 'The Case of Peng Tehhuai';
op. cit.; p. 339-40).
"General Lo . . was a recent
convert to the modernisers".
(Gerard H. Corr:
'The Chinese Red Army: Campaigns and Politics since 1949'; Reading; 1974;
p. 149).
In the sphere of military science,
Lo held that the strategy of guerilla warfare originally adopted by the
CPC was no longer suitable for China now that the People's Republic had
become a sovereign power, and that the strategy of guerilla warfare
needed to be replaced by more orthodox military strategy. Indeed,
among many PLA officers, Mao's military ideas were dismissed as:
"A romantic day-dream inspired
by nostalgia for the caves of Yenan, holding China back from building
the modern armed forces that she needs"
(Joan Robinson: 'The Cultural
Revolution in China'; Harmondsworth; 1969; p. 32).
Chu Teh, the commander-in-chief
of the PLA, said in a radio broadcast in August 1951:
"Our troops . . must absorb
the highly advanced military science of the Soviet Union". (Chu Teh:
Broadcast of August 1951, in: Gerard H. Corr: op.
cit.; p. 143).
However, the comprador bourgeois
grouping within the Party, headed by Mao Tse-tung, aimed to use the PLA
primarily as a weapon against the national bourgeoisie rather than an instrument
of national defence, and therefore demanded that the PLA retain its reliance
on guerilla warfare and a military organisation appropriate for such warfare.
Lin Piao, the new Minister of
National Defence:
"Was given the job of remoulding
a new PLA, one more to Mao's liking and one which in the future could be
used as a military-political instrument'".
(Gerard H. Carr: op. cit.; p.
147).
On becoming Defence Minister, Lin:
" . . had overtly dropped the
interest he had once shown in what Mao called 'positional warfare' and,
unhesitatingly, accepted . . the Chairman's
concept of a people's war with all the supporting ideology".
(Clare Hollingworth: 'Mao
and the Men against him'; London; 1985; p.
104).
Thus, Lin Piao played up:
"The role of the militia and
of unconventional forces rather than of the regular army".
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
op. cit.; p. 340).
and he:
"Began his reform of the PLA
by bringing back into prominence the Military Affairs Commission (MAC)
of the Party'".
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
ibid.; p. 336).
and
"Giving greater power to the
Army's Political Department,"
(Gerard H. Carr: op. cit.; p.
148).
The MAC was:
"The command vehicle through
which the Party exercises control over the professional military.
. . . Day-to-day leadership of this body generally resided in the
Minister of Defence."
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
op. cit.; p. 336).
Also, Lin began:
"To stress the use of Mao Tse-tung
Thought in the military".
(Kenneth Lieberthal (1987):
op. cit.; p. 337).
In his capacity of Chief-of-Staff,
Lo Jui-ching resisted the introduction of 'Mao Tse-tung Thought' into the
PLA, and after November 1965 he ceased to appear in public in his
official capacity. However, no official announcement of his
removal was made, and it was not until August 1966 that this
was implied in the official reference to General YANG Cheng-wu* as Acting
Chief of Staff.
Later, during the Cultural Revolution,
Lo was accused of:
In September 1965:
"Lin Piao's famous programmatic
document, 'Long live the Victory of People's War!', was published".
(David Milton, Nancy Milton
& Franz Schurmann (Eds.): op. cit.; p. 226).
Apart from approving Mao's
theses on 'people's war', it supported the theory of the
revolutionary movement spreading from the countryside to the cities:
At a Central Work Conference
in September/October 1965, Mao severely criticised a
play written in 1961 by WU Han*, historian and Deputy Mayor
of Peking, entitled 'Hai Jui dismissed from Office'. Hai Jui
was an official of the Ming period, renowned for his
honesty, who had been dismissed by the Emperor, and Mao
regarded the play as:
"A veiled political attack on
Mao's 1959 dismissal of Peng Teh-huai."
(Hong Y. Lee: 'The
Politics of the Chinese Cultural Revolution: A Case Study'; Berkeley (USA);
1978; p. 11).
and demanded that the play be criticised
by:
"The Group of Five in charge
of revolutionising literature and art".
(Hong Y. Lee: ibid.; p. 11).
It was:
"a very stormy meeting".
(Jean Esmein: op. cit.; p. 56).
at which Mao gave 'instructions':
"regarding the criticism of
Wu Han".
('Circular of the
CC of the CPC' (May 1966), 'CCP Documents of the Great
Proletarian Cultural Revolution: 1966-1967' (hereafter listed
as 'CCP Documents (1968)'; Hong Kong; 1968; p. 20).
But:
"Mao was in a minority".
(Shamsul Alam: op. cit.; p.
15).
and no critique of Wu Han emerged
from the meeting.
Shortly afterwards:
"Mao withdrew to Shanghai".
(Jean Esmein: op. cit.; p. 56).
As Mao himself expressed it in January
1967:
"In September and October
1965, the central committee surrendered to
revisionism, and I thought that
I could not put my ideas into practice in
Peking".
(Mao Tse-tung: 'Statement
of January 1967', in: 'Keesing's Contemporary
Archives', Volume 16; p. 21,985).
He:
"Therefore left the capital,
where the Party machine was controlled by his opponents, and
settled in Shanghai".
('Keesing's Contemorary Archives',
Volume 16; p. 21,985).
Of course:
Mao:
"Had to go to Shanghai to find
his man who might expose the socalled bourgeois outlook in culture and
ideology. It was Yao Wen-yuan who drafted the critique of 'Hai Jui' and
Wu Han".
(Alam Shamsul: op. cit.; p.
8).
The critique, although:
". . commissioned
by Mao, was turned down by every official publication
in Peking."
(David Milton, Nancy Milton
& Franz Schurmann: op. cit.; p. 225).
but was published in November 1965
in the Shanghai newspaper 'Wen-hui Daily'.
Yao's critique was, in fact:
In February 1966 the Group of Five
finally published its report on the 'Wu Han Affair' -- a document
which became known as the 'February Thesis' -- in the
name of the CC of the CPC. It criticised Wu Han, but
implied that the matter involved academic questions, such as:
"The appraisal of historical
figures, and the viewpoint and method of historical research".
('Outline Report concerning
the Current Academic Discussion of the Group of Five in Charge of
the Cultural Revolution' (February 1966), in: 'CCP Documents
(1968)'; op. cit.; p. 7).
rather than questions of political
principle, as Mao demanded. In essence,
"the report discarded any connection
between the play of Wu Han and Peng Teh-huai's dismissal".
(Shamsun Alam: op. cit.; p.
9).
It said:
"As regards people like Wu Han,
who treats history with the bourgeois world outlook and committed political
mistakes, the discussion in the press should not be confined to political
questions, but should go fully into the various academic and theoretical
questions involved".. ('Outline Report concerning the Current Academic
Discussion of the Group of Five in Charge of the Cultural Revolution' (February
1966), in: 'CCP Documents (1968)': op. cit.; p. 10).
It even defended the right to put
forward anti-Marxist ideas by quoting some of Mao's own pronouncements
during the 'Hundred Flowers' campaign:
In May 1966, the comprador bourgeois
grouping within the Party leadership persuaded an enlarged meeting
of the Political Bureau of the CC of the CPC to denounce, in the name of
the Central Committee, the 'February Thesis' as:
"An outline report by Peng Chen
alone",
('Circular of
CC of CPC' (May 1966), in: 'CCP Documents (1968)':
ibid.; p. 21).
and one which:
"Violates the basic Marxist
thesis that all class struggles are political struggles".
('Circular of CC of CPC' (May
1966), in: 'CCP Documents (1968)'; ibid.;
p. 22).
It therefore revoked
the 'February Thesis' and dissolved the Group of Five':
"The Central Committee
has decided to revoke the 'Outline Report on the Current
Academic Discussion made by the Group of Five in Charge of the Cultural
Revolution . . ., to dissolve the 'Group of Five in charge of the
Cultural Revolution' and its offices."
('Circular of CC of CPC' (May
1966), in: 'CCP Documents (1968); ibid.; p. 20).
It charged that the 'February Thesis',
"While feigning compliance,
. . . actually opposes and stubbornly resists
the great cultural revolution initiated and
led personally by Comrade Mao Tse-tung, as well as the instruction
regarding the criticism of Wu Han which he gave . . .
in September and October 1965. .
It obscures the sharp class
struggle that is taking place on the cultural and ideological front."
('Circular of CC of CPC' (May
1966), in: CCP Documents (1968); of the Great Proletarian
Cultural Revolution: 1966-1967'; ibid.; p. 20).
It replaced the existing 'Group
of Five' by a new 'Cultural Revolution Group' controlled by the comprador
bourgeois grouping within the leadership of the Party. That is, it
resolved
"To set up a new Cultural Revolution
Group directly under the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau".
('Circular of CC of CPC' (May
1966), in: 'CCP Documents (1968)'; ibid.; p. 20).
The new 'Cultural Revolution
Group' was known as the:
"'Cultural Revolution Small Group'''.
(Hong Y. Lee: op. cit.; p. 16).
and was placed:
"under the leadership of Chiang
Ching, who took control of the Party propaganda machine".
(Hong Y. Lee: ibid.; p. 16).
THE 'CULTURAL REVOLUTION', PROPERLY
SO-CALLED, HAD BEGUN.
BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES -- 8
CHANG Chun-chiao, revisionist
journalist and politician (1917-90);
Director, East China
Branch, New China News Agency (1950); managing director,
'Liberation Army Daily' (1954); Deputy President,
Shanghai Branch, All-China Journalists' Association (1955);
member, Shanghai Municipal Committee, CPC (1958);
secretary, Shanghai Municipality CPC (1958-71);
director, propaganda department, Shanghai
Municipal Committee, CPC (1963); secretary, East China Bureau,
CC, CPC (1966-67); 1st Secretary and Director, Shanghai Municipal
People's Commune (1967); deputy head, Cultural
Revolution Small Group, CC, CPC (1967-69);
director, Shanghai Garrison, PLA (1967-76); member, Politburo,
CC, CPC (1969-76); member, Standing Committee, Politburo,
CC, CPC (1971-76); director, General Political Department (1975-76);
Deputy Premier (197576); dismissed from all posts and arrested (1976);
tried and found guilty of counter-revolutionary crimes
and sentenced to death (1980-81); sentence commuted
to life imprisonment (1983); died in prison (1990).
KANG Sheng, Chinese revisionist
politician (1903-75); member, Politburo, CC,
CPC (1934-56, 1966-75);
secretary, CC, CPC (1937-56, 1962-67); member,
Central People's Government
Council (1949-54); 1st Secretary, Shantung
Province CPC (1949-55);
Governor, Shantung Province (1949-55); member,
East China Military and Administrative
Council (1950-62); member, East
China Administrative
Committee (1952-55); political commissar, PLA,
Shantung Military District (1953);
adviser, Cultural Revolutionary Small
Group, CC, CPC (1967-69);
member, Standing Committee, Politburo, CC, CPC
(1969-75); Deputy Chairman,
CC, CPC (1973-75); expelled posthumously from
CPC (1980).
LEI Feng, Chinese revisionist
soldier (1940-62); held up as paragon of virtues by Chinese revisionists;
killed in accident (1962).
LO Jui-ching, Chinese revisionist
military officer (1906- ); member, Supreme People's Procuratorate
(1949-54); member, Goverment Administrative
Council) (1949-54); Minister of Public Security (1949-59);
Director, Public Security Bureau, Peking (1949); Commander,
PLA Public Security Forces (1950-59); political commissar,
Public Security Forces (1953-59); member, National Defence Council (1954-65);
Chief of General Staff (195965); Deputy Premier (1959-66); Deputy Minister
of National Defence (1959-
66); secretary-general,
Military Affairs Committee, CPC (1961-65); general
(1955); secretary, CC, CPC (1962-66); Deputy Chairman, National
Defence Council (1965-66).
LUO Ruiching = Pinyin form of
LO Jui-ching.
WANG Hongwen = Pinyin form of
WANG Hung-wen.
WANG Hung-wen, Chinese
revisionist politician (1935-92); member, Shanghai Municipal
Revolutionary Committee (1967); Deputy Chairman,
Shanghai Municipal Revolutionary Committee (1967-73); secretary,
Shanghai Municipality, CPC (1971-72); member, Politburo,
CC, CPC (1973-76); member, Standing Committee,
Politburo, CC, CPC (1973-76); Deputy Chairman,
CC, CPC (1973-76); expelled from CPC and arrested (1976); tried and sentenced
for counter-revolutionary crimes (1980-81); died in prison (1992).
WU Han, Chinese revisionist
historian, journalist and politician (1909- ); Dean,
College of Arts, and head, Department of History,
Tsinghua University (1949-50); member, Standing Committee, University Administration
Committee, Tsinghua University (1949-52); member,
Standing Committee, All-China
Federation of Democratic Youth (1949-66);
Deputy Mayor, Peking (1949-66);
Deputy Chairman, University Administrative Centre, Tsinghua University
(1951-52); member, editorial board, 'New Observer' (1959-66);
President, Peking TV University (196466).
YANG Cheng-wu,
Chinese revisionist military officer (1914- );
deputy commander, Peking-Tientsin Garrison, PLA (1950);
member, North China Administrative Council (1951-54); deputy
commander, North China Military Region (1952-54); member,
North China Defence Council (1954-68); commander,
Peking-Tientsin Garrison, PLA (1954-56); colonel-general
(1955); commander, Air Defence Command, PLA (1956-58); commander,
Peking Military Region (1957-59); Deputy Chief of Staff, PLA
(1959-66); Acting Chief of Staff, PLA (1966-68); deputy head, PLA Cultural
Revolution Group (1967-68); deputy chairman, Military
Commission, CC, CPC (1967-68); removed from all posts,
tried and sentenced to imprisonment for counterrevolutionary crimes (1968);
rehabilitated by revisionists (1974).
YANG Chengwu = Pinyin form of
YANG Cheng-wu.
YAO Wen-yuan, revisionist journalist
and politician (1931- ); member, Cultural
Revolution Small Group (1966-69); member, Shanghai Municipal
Revolutionary Committee (1967-69); deputy chairman, Municipal Revolutionary
Committee, Shanghai (1967-76); chief editor, 'People's
Daily' (1967); member, Politburo, CC, CPC (1969-76); dismissed
from all posts and arrested (1976); tried, found guilty of
counter-revolutionary crimes and sentenced to imprisonment; released from
prison (1996).
YAO Wenyuan = Pinyin form of
YAO Wen-yuan.
ZHANG Chunqiao = Pinyin form
of CHANG Chun-chiao.
CHAPTER FIFTEEN : THE 'CULTURAL
REVOLUTION'
(April 1966 - April 1969)
INTRODUCTION
THE 'GREAT PROLETARIAN
CULTURAL REVOLUTION' WAS AN ATTEMPT BY THE POLITICAL
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COMPRADOR BOURGEOISIE WITHIN THE COMMUNIST
PARTY, HEADED BY MAO TSE-TUNG:
TO DESTROY THE POLITICAL POWER
OF THE NATIONAL BOURGEOISIE, HEADED BY LIU SHAO-CHI,
BY MOBILISING AGAINST THEM:
FIRSTLY,
THE YOUTH; WHEN THAT FAILED,
SECONDLY,
THE WORKERS; AND WHEN THAT IN TURN FAILED,
THIRDLY,
THE PEOPLE'S LIBERATION ARMY.
In other words,
THE 'CULTURAL REVOLUTION' WAS NEITHER CULTURAL
NOR REVOLUTIONARY, BUT POLITICAL AND COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY.
The Initiation of the 'Cultural
Revolution' (April 1966)
The 'Cultural Revolution' began
in April 1966, when Premier Chou En-lai:
"Called for a fierce and
protracted struggle to wipe out 'bourgeois ideology'
in the academic, educational and journalistic fields,
in art, literature and all other fields of culture".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 15; p. 21,577).
In the same month, April 1966, the
newspaper 'Liberation Army Daily', the most important press
organ under the control of the comprador bourgeois
grouping of the Party, published an editorial which declared:
"There exists in our literary
and art circles an anti-Party, antisocialist black line
running counter to Mao Tse-tung's thinking. .
We must . . .
take an active part in the great socialist revolution on the cultural front,
thorougly eradicate this black line. . We must not mind being blamed
for 'brandishing the stick"'.
('Hold High the
Great Red Banner of Mao Tse-tung's Thinking: Actively participate
in the Great Socialist Cultural Revolution', in:
'Peking Review', Volume 9, No. 18 (29 April 1966); p. 6, 9).
In May 1966, Yao Wen-yuan in:
"'Liberation Army Daily' published
a violent attack . . . on three journals published by the Peking
Party -- the 'Peking Daily'. the 'Peking Evening News' and the fortnightly
'Front Line
('Keesing 's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 15; p. 21,577).
denouncing them as:
". . instruments for opposing
the Party and socialism".
(Yao Wen-yuan:
'On Three-Family Village' (May 1966), in: 'Peking Review',
Volume 9. No. 22 (27 May 1966); p. 5).
In June 1966,
the 'People's Daily', now controlled by the comprador
bourgeois grouping of the Party, published a violent
attack on the Party leadership at Peking University:
"Peking University . . is a
key point of the 'Three-Family Village' sinister gang, a stubborn
bastion used by them to oppose the Party and socialism.
The people of the whole
country will rise up, oppose and knock down all those who oppose Chairman
Mao. . . . The whole nation will smash their
sinister gang, sinister organisation and sinister discipline to pieces."
('Hail the Big Character
Poster at Peking University' (June 1966), in:
'Peking Review', Volume 9, No.
37 (9 September 1966); p. 21, 22).
On the following day, it was announced:
"That the Central Committee
of the CPC had decided to reorganise the Peking Party Committee."
('Keesing' s Contemporary Archives',
Volume 15; p. 21,577).
as well as:
"The Party Committee of Peking
University".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 15; p. 21,577).
and had appointed a new Peking First
Secretary in place of Peng Chen, ('Keesing's Contemporary Archives', Volume
15; p. 21,577).
The announcement was:
The first stage of the Cultural
Revolution:
"Was led by the students".
(David Milton, Nancy Milton
& Franz Schurmann (Eds.): 'People's China: Social
Experimentation, Politics, Entry onto the World
Scene: 1966 through 1972'; New York; 1974; op. cit.; p. 230).
From May 1966, young people
were recruited into a para-military fascist-type organisation called
'Red Guards':
"The PLA and People's
Militia trained groups of teenagers in schools and universities to
form Red Guard units which were designed . . .
to promote the teachings of the Chairman".
(Clare Hollingworth: op. cit.;
p. 136).
The 'Red Guards' were designed to
function as a shock force against
the political representatives of the national bourgeoisie:
"The Red Guards are the
shock force of the great proletarian cultural revolution
('In Praise of the Red
Guards' (September 1966), in: 'Peking Review Volume 9,
No. 39 (23 September 1966); p. 15).
Significantly, their
allegiance was declared to be, not to the Communist
Party but to Mao Tse-tung personally:
"The Red Guards say, and
say it well:
'Chairman Mao is our red
commander and we are the young,
red soldiers of Chairnan Mao . .''
They carry with them copies of 'Quotations
from Chairman Mao"'.
('In Praise of the Red
Guards' (September 1966), in: 'Peking Review
Volume 9, No. 39 (23 September
1966); p. 15).
accepting the dictum that
'a genuine revolutionary' is one who accepts 'Mao Tse-tung
Thought' without question:
"The attitude towards Mao Tse-tung's
Thought, whether to accept it or reject it, to support it or oppose
it, to love it warmly or be hostile to it, this is the touchstone to test
and the watershed between true revolution and sham revolution, between
revolution and counterrevolution."
('Mao Tse-tung's Thought
is the Telescope and Microscope of our Revolutionary Cause' (June 1966),
in: 'Peking Review', Volume 9, No. 24 (10 June 1966); p. 7).
In June 1966:
"Universities and schools were
closed indefinitely to enable them (the students - Ed.) to participate
in the Cultural Revolution".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 16; p. 21,986).
In July 1966:
"Great prominence was given
in the Chinese Press . . . to a report that Mr.
Mao had swum nine miles in the Yangtze River in
65 minutes, apparently in order to dispel rumours
that he was in poor health".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 15; p. 21,579).
In August 1966, at a mass rally
of Red Guards in Peking, Mao:
"Signified his approval of the
movement by donning the red armband
which they wore."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 15; p. 21,986).
Between August and December 1966:
"eight such giant rallies of
a million or more Red Guards were held in the great Tien An Men Square
in Peking".
(David Milton, Nancy Milton
& Franz Schurmann (Eds.): op. cit.;p. 268).
In August 1966, it was announced:
"that the entire printing industry
would be mobilised to print 35
million copies of the 'Selected Works' of Mao Tse-tung by the end of
1967".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 15; p. 21,579).
In November 1966, Teng Hsiao-ping
was dismissed as general secretary of the CPC.
In December 1966:
"Peng Chen was dragged from
his bed and arrested by Red Guards and was displayed before a rally of
100,000 Red Guards in a Peking stadium."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 16; p 21,987).
Also 'arrested' by Red Guards were:
"Lo Jui-ching"
.
('Keesing's Contemporary
Archives', Volume 16; p. 21,987).
who had been secretly removed as
Chief of Staff in November 1965, accused of:
"Opposing the thorough establishment
by our army of the absolute
authority of the great thought
of Mao Tse-tung".
(Yang Cheng-wu: 'Thoroughly
establish the Absolute Authority of the Great
Supreme Commander
Chairman Mao and of his Great Thought' (November
1967), in: 'Peking Review',
Volume 19. No. 46 (10 November 1967); p. 19).
and:
"Lu Ting-yi"
('Keesing's Contemporary
Archives', Volume 16; p. 21,987).
former:
". . head of the propaganda
department and Minister of Culture"'.
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 15; p. 21,578).
who had been:
". . removed from both posts."
('Keesing's Contemporary
Archives', Volume 15; p. 21,578).
in July 1966.
The 11th Plenum of
the 8th CC (August 1966)
The 11th Plenum of the 8th
CC of the CPC was held in August 1966:
". . guarded by the troops of
Lin Piao",
(Alam Shamsul: op. cit.; p.
17).
and:
"Mao resorted to the extraordinary
measures of packing the galleries with . . . youthful
supporters and convoking only about half the total CC membership".
(Lowell Dittmer: 'Liu
Shao-chi and the Chinese Cultural Revolution: The Politics of Mass
Criticism'; Berkeley (USA); 1974; p. 95).
At the Plenum:
" . . presided over by Comrade
Mao Tse-tung",
('Communique of
11th Plenum of CC of CPC' (August 1966), in: 'CCP
Documents': op. cit.; p. 62).
p. 1).
those present:
"Were confronted with a big-character
poster written by Mao himself",
(David Milton, Nancy Milton
& Franz Schurmann (Eds.): op. cit.; p. 267-
68).
reading:
"Bombard the Headquarters!"
(Mao Tse-tung: Big-Character
Poster (August 1966), in: David Milton, Nancy Milton & Franz
Schurmann (Eds.): ibid.; p. 268).
The poster:
"Was immediately understood
by all the delegates as an attack on Liu Shao-chi, Teng
Hsiao-ping, and other prominent leaders of the powerful Party
apparatus."
(David Milton, Nancy Milton
& Franz Schurmann (Eds.): op. cit.; p. 268).
The Plenum:
"Demoted Liu Shao-chi . . .
and elevated Lin Piao, the Minister of Defence, to the post of Deputy
Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party. Lin was officially proclaimed
as 'Chairman Mao's closest comrade-in-arms and successor'."
(David Milton, Nancy Milton
& Franz Schurmann (Eds.): op. cit.; p. 268).
It gave formal approval both to
the 'Cultural Revolution' and to 'Mao Tse-tung Thought'. It stressed:
"That the series of directives
by Comrade Mao Tse-tung concerning the great proletarian cultural revolution
are the guide to action in the present cultural revolution of our country
('Communique of 11th Plenum of CC of CPC' (August
1966), in: 'CCP
Documents': op. cit.; p. 65).
It reiterated that:
"Our objective is to struggle
against and crush those persons in authority who are taking the capitalist
road".
('Decision of the CC of the
CPC concerning the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution' (August 1966),
in: 1CCP Documentst: op. cit.; p. 42).
and instructed:
"Trust the masses, rely
on them, and respect their initiative. Cast out fear. Don't
be afraid of disorder".
(tDecision of the CC of the
CPC concerning the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution' CPC' (August
1966), in: 'CCP Documents': op. cit.; p. 45).
In particular, the Plenum emphasised:
To counter the offensive of the
'Red Guards', Liu Shao-chi:
"Organised a large number of
work teams -- perhaps four hundred teams with more than ten thousand
members in all -- and dispatched them to universities and high schools
and to bureaucratic agencies . . . to re-establish Party
leadership over the student movement . .
The work teams
were able to restore a modicum of normality to many universities"
(Harry Harding (1991): op. cit.;
p. 136).
On the other hand:
"In the long run, the
student movement became unmanageable because of factional quarrels".
(David Milton, Nancy Milton
& Franz Schurmann (Eds.): op. cit.; p. 229).
Thus, the political representatives
of the national bourgeoisie were:
"Able to repulse the first attack
by Red Guards in August and September
(1966 - Ed.) by mobilising workers . . . in their defence".
(Philip Bridgham: 'Maoist
Cultural Revolution in 1967', (hereafter listed as
'Philip Bridgham (1971)'); in: Richard Baum (Ed.): 'China
in Ferment: Perspectives
on the Cultural Revolution'; Englewood Cliffs (USA);
1971; p. 122).
As a result of the failure of the
Red Guards to fulfil the role allotted to them, it was announced
in November 1966:
"That free transport, food and
accommodation would no longer be provided for Red Guards coming to Peking".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 16; p. 21,986).
and:
"that Red Guards from the provinces
must leave the city within three days".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 16; p. 22,986).
The political representatives of
the comprador bourgeoisie responded to the failure of the campaign of the
'Red Guards' in November 1966 by seeking to supplement them with adult
workers -- called 'Revolutionary Rebels':
"The campaign began .
. . with the formation of new 'revolutionary rebel' organisations
in industrial and mining establishments."
(Philip Bridgham (1971): op.
cit.; p. 122).
The 'Revolutionary Rebels':
". . consisting of adult workers,
replaced the Red Guards from this time on as the main agents of the Cultural
Revolution."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives?,
Volume 15; p. 21,988).
However:
"The Revolutionary Rebels .
. . did not form a single movement organised on a national
scale. . . Scores of
militant Maoist organisations bearing a wide variety of names
sprang up throughout the country, often operating independently
and even in rivalry. In Shanghai, for example, there were at
least 31 Revolutionary Rebel and Red Guard organisations.
. . . In many cities and provinces the Revolutionary
Rebels were opposed by equally militant anti-Maoist organisations."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 16; p. 21,988-89).
In other words, under the direction
of the political representatives of the national bourgeoisie:
"Armed organisations
were formed to resist them (the 'Revolutionary
Rebels' - Ed.)".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 16; p. 21,985).
Furthermore, under the influence
of the demagogic pseudo-left propaganda of the 'Cultural Revolution', the
'Revolutionary Rebels' demanded:
"higher wages, lower working
hours, better housing, improved medical care and other benefits."
(Stanley Karnow: op. cit.;p.
265).
In many areas, the 'Revolutionary
Rebels' pursued their demands with strikes, which reached particular intensity
in Shanghai:
"Widespread strikes in support
of demands for wage increases began in Shanghai at the end of December
(1966 -- Ed.). . . . The port
was brought to a standstill".
('Keesing 's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 16; p. 21,989).
The port officials:
"Revolutionaries', fearful
of being branded as 'revisionist counterpromised
to satisfy every demand".
(Stanley Karnow: op. cit.; p.
265).
and as a result:
"They were then told that
they had been hoodwinked into following the 'evil road
of economism"'.
(Philip Bridgham (1971): op.
cit.; p. 123).
The struggle:
During the early months of the 'Cultural
Revolution', the Army had:
". . remained neutral in the
struggle".
('Keesing's Contemporary
Archives', Volume 16; p. 21,989).
But by January 1967 the 'Cultural
Revolution' had brought the country to a state of:
"Anarchy".
(Philip Bridgham (1971):
op. cit.; p. 125).
and:
". . only one institution had
the capacity to fill the power vacuum the Army".
(Stanley Karnow: op. cit.; p.
275).
Resistance:
"to involving the Army in the
Cultural Revolution . . . was apparently led by officers like Marshal
HO Lung*".
(Stanley Karnow: ibid.; p. 279).
and in May 1967 Red Guards arraigned
Ho Lung:
"Before a kangaroo court and
. . he disappeared from public view".
(Stanley Karnow: ibid.; 282).
In January 1967, the policy of army
non-involvement was changed:
"In the light of the general
stalemate that had occurred throughout the fall, and the collapse of authority
that had begun to appear around the turn of the year."
(Harry Harding: 'The Chinese
State in Crisis' (hereafter listed as 'Harry Harding (1991)', in:
Roderick MacFarlane & John K. Fairbank (Eds.): 'The Cambridge History
of China1 Volume 15: The People's Republic, Part
2: 'Revolutions
within the Chinese Revolution; 1966-1992'; Cambridge; 1991;
op. cit.; p. 161).
and the PLA was ordered to intervene
in the 'Cultural Revolution1 on the side of the 'revolutionary Leftists':
"All past directives
concerning the army's non-involvement in the great cultural
revolution . . . are null and void. Active
support must be rendered to the broad masses of revolutionary Leftists
in their struggle to seize power. .
Counter-revolutionaries
and counter-revolutionary organisations who oppose the
proletarian revolutionary Leftists must be
resolutely suppressed".
('Decision .
. . concerning the Resolute Support of the PLA for the
Revolutionary Masses of the Left' (January 1967), in 'CCP Documents': op.
cit.; p. 196).
It was decided:
"That the former provincial
and municipal administrations must be replaced by Revolutionary Committees,
based on a 'triple alliance' of Revolutionary
Rebels, Army representatives."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 16; p. 21,992).
And:
"Old Party cadres who had passed
the test of the Cultural Revolution".
(David Milton, Nancy Milton
& Franz Schurmann (Eds.): op. cit.; p. 354).
'Revolutionary Committees':
"Were set up between November
1967 and May 1968 in 16 provinces
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 16; p. 22,945).
while in August and September 1968:
"Revolutionary Committees were
established . . . in the five remaining provinces"
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 16; p. 22,945).
The PLA played by far the dominant
role in the 'Revolutionary Committees':
"The triple alliance policy
in practice gave the Army control of the 'revolutionary committees"'.
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 16; p. 21,993).
with Maoist politicians:
"playing only a subsidiary role".
('Keesing's Contemporary
Archives', Volume 16; p. 22,945).
In most provinces,
"the chairman of the committee
was the local political commissar or military commander".
('Keesing 's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 22,949).
In January 1968:
"The public sale of Red Guard
literature was forbidden . . . on the ground that certain of them fomented
'sectarianism'".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 16; p. 22,949).
and July 1968 saw:
"The last campaign of the historic
Peking Red Guards. Massive worker and army teams were sent in to direct
and lead the universities. The mass movement was over."
(David Milton, Nancy Milton
& Franz Schurmann (Eds.): op. cit.; p. 354).
and Mao himself:
"repudiated the Red Guards".
(Stanley Karnow: op.
cit.; p. 441).
In October 1968, the CC of the CPC
ordered that:
"all schools and universities
. . . should reopen immediately".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 16; p. 22,949).
The Rebuilding of the Party
(September 1968 - August 1971)
During this time, the Communist
Party had "disintegrated":
"Except in the Army, (the CPC-Editor)
had virtually disintegrated during the Cultural Revolution". ('Keesing's
Contemporary Archives', Volume 18; p. 24,698).
"Reorganisation of the Communist
Party . . began in September 1968, local branches being established first."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 24,698).
and the:
". . pattern of military predominance
was dutifully applied to the Party Committees germinating in the provinces."
(Stanley Karnow: op. cit.; p.
462).
"At the provincial level, . .
. Party authority gradually slipped into the hands of the local PLA leaders".
(Liao Kuang-sheng: 'Factional
Politics after the Cultural Revolution: The Gang of Four and "Old Revolutionaries"'
(hereafter listed as 'Liao Kuangsheng (1977)'), in: Steve S.K.Chin
(Ed.): 'The Gang of Four: First Essays after the Fall'; Hong Kong;
1977; p. 124).
while:
"The Red Guards ended up with
derisory treatment."
(Stanley Karnow: op. cit.; p.
458).
In almost all provinces:
"The post of First Party Secretary
was assumed by the Chairman of the provincial Revolutionary Committee,
who in most cases was an army officer or political commissar, whilst
the majority of the assistant secretaries were also officers or political
commissars".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 24,698).
The last of the new Party Committees:
"were finally established in
late August 1971".
(Stanley Karnow: op. cit.; p.
463).
The 12th Plenum of the 8th CC
(October 1968)
The 12th Plenum of
the 8th CC of the CPC was held in October 1968. Like the 11th Plenum
in August 1966, it:
"Was a rump session. .
. . Only 54 full members of the Central Committee attended the
meeting, representing a bare quorum of the surviving members
of the body. Furthermore, like its predecessor the 12th Plenum was packed
with people who were not Central Committee members.
. . The extra participants were members of the
Cultural Revolution Group, representatives of the provincial revolutionary
committees, and 'principal responsible comrades of the Chinese People's
Liberation Army"'.
(Harry Harding (1991): op. cit.;
p. 193-94).
The Plenum:
"announced that Liu Shao-chi
was being dismissed from all his government and Party positions,
and was being expelled from the Party 'once and for all'".
(Harry Harding (1991): ibid.;
p. 194).
as a:
"'renegade, traitor and scab
hiding in the Party', as 'a lackey of imperialism and modern revisionism,
and Kuomintang reactionaries."
('Resolution of 12th Plenum
of 8th CC, CPC' (October 1968), in: Harry Harding (1991):
ibid.; p. 194-95).
However, THAT THE VICTORY
OF THE POLITICAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COMPRADOR BOURGEOISIE IN
THE 'CULTURAL REVOLUTION' WAS NOT COMPLETE OR DECISIVE WAS ILLUSTRATED
BY THE FACT THAT, AT THE PLENUM:
"The Cultural Revolution Group's
proposal that Teng Hsiao-ping . . . be expelled from the Party altogether,
along with Liu Shaochi, was rejected".
(Harry Harding (1991): ibid.;
p. 195).
The 9th National Congress of
the CPC (April 1969)
The 9th National Congress of
the CPC was held in April 1969:
"The first such conference to
be held in more than a decade".
(Stanley Karnow: op. cit.;p.
454).
It was:
"held in conditions of strict
secrecy, no journalists or foreign observers being admitted".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 17; p. 23,377).
and:
"No foreign parties were invited
to send delegations."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 17; p. 23,379).
Delegates to the Congress were:
" appointed by the central authorities
after 'negotiation' with the provinces."
(Harry Harding (1991): op. cit.;
p. 193).
Reporting on the Cultural Revolution,
Lin Piao declared that it had achieved a
". . great victory",
Lin Piao: Report on the Cultural
Revolution, 9th National Congress CPC (April 1969), in: Stanley Karnow:
op. cit.; p. 405).
Although admitting that:
"We cannot speak of final victory."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 17; p. 23,377).
As has been said, the PLA:
"Emerged as the single most
powerful institution in China at the 9th Congress."
(Frederick C. Teiwes & Warren
Sun: op. cit.; p. 127).
The congress adopted a new Party
Constitution, replacing that of 1956. It declared:
"The Communist Party of China
takes Marxism-Leninism and Mao Tse-tung's thought as the theoretical basis
guiding its thinking. Mao Tse-tung's thought is Marxism-Leninism of the
era in which imperialism is heading for total collapse and Socialism is
advancing to world-wide victory".
('Constitution of CPC adopted
at 9th National Congress' (April 1969), in: 'Keesing's Contemporary
Archives', Volume 17; p. 23,378).
and laid down that:
"Comrade Lin Piao is Comrade
Mao Tse-tung's close comrade-inarms and successor." ('Constitution of CPC
adopted at 9th National Congress' (April 1969), in: 'Keesing's Contemporary
Archives', Volume 17; p. 23,378).
A new Central Committee was elected,
to which:
"Only 54 out of
the 167 members of the previous Central Committee were re-elected".
(Harry Harding (1991): op. cit.; p. 197).
It:
"Was overwhelmingly weighted
in favour of Army officers and Party cadres who had survived the Cultural
Revolution."
(Stanley Karnow: op. cit.; p.
458).
At its 1st Plenum the new
Central Committee elected a Politburo -- and its Standing Committee
with Mao as Chairman, Lin Piao as Deputy Chairman, Chen Po-ta, Chou En-lai
and Kang Sheng.
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 17; p. 23,378).
while new members of the Politburo:
"Included YEH Chun* (Lin Piao's
wife -- Ed.), Chiang Ching, Chu Teh, Chiang Chun-chiao, Yao Wen-Yuan".
('Keesing 's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 17; p. 23,378).
CONCLUSION
WITH THE 9th CONGRESS OF
THE CPC IN APRIL 1969, THE "GREAT PROLETARIAN CULTURAL REVOLUTION"
EFFECTIVELY -- ALTHOUGH NOT OFFICIALLY -- CAME TO AN END.
The 'Cultural Revolution':
"Whilst virtually destroying
the Communist Party organisation, greatly strengthened the political role
of the Army, which largely controlled the provincial Revolutionary
Committees and many Ministries and economic enterprises."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,437).
IT LEFT THE COMPRADOR BOURGEOIS
GROUPING WITHIN THE PARTY, HEADED BY MAO TSE-TUNG, IN THE DOMINANT
POSITION AND THE NATIONAL BOURGEOIS GROUPING, HEADED BY LIU SHAO-CHI, IN
A GREATLY -- ALTHOUGH NOT FATALLY - WEAKENED POSITION.
BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES --9
HE Long = Pinyin form of
HO Lung.
HO Lung, Chinese
revisionist military officer (1896- ); member,
Central
People's Government Council
(1949-54); commander, South-Western Military
Region (1950-54);
secretary, South-Western Bureau, CC, CPC (1952-54);
secretary, CPC,
South-western Military Region (1953); Deputy Chairman,
South-Western Administrative
Council (1953-56); Deputy Chairman, People's
Revolutionary Military
Council (1954); Deputy Chairman, National Defence
Council (1954-67);
Deputy Premier (1954-67); marshal (1955); member,
Politburo, CC,
CPC (1956-66); Deputy Chairman, Military Commission, CC,
CPC (1961-67).
YE Qun = Pinyin form of YEH Chun.
YEH Chun, Chinese revisionist
journalist and politician, wife of Lin Piao (? 1971); member,
PLA Cultural Revolution Group (1967); member, Politburo, CC, CPC (1969-71);
killed in air crash fleeing to Soviet Union (1971).
CHAPTER SIXTEEN : THE 'LIN PIAO
AFFAIR';
(September 1971 - August 1973)
Introduction
As we have seen, the 'Cultural
Revolution' was basically a struggle for power between the political representatives
of the comprador bourgeoisie and those of the national bourgeoisie
of China.
But as the Cultural Revolution
drew to a close,
A LATENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST
WAS BECOMING MANIFEST WITHIN THE CHINESE COMPRADOR BOURGEOISIE
--
BETWEEN THAT SECTION
LINKED TO UNITED STATES IMPERIALISM AND THAT SECTION LINKED
TO SOVIET IMPERIALISM.
This contradiction was
reflected in:
CONTRADICTIONS WITHIN THE
COMMUNIST PARTY OF CHINA BETWEEN THE GROUPING REPRESENTING THE POLITICAL
INTERESTS OF
THE PRO-US COMPRADORS,
HEADED BY MAO TSE-TUNG,
AND THE GROUPING REPRESENTING
THE POLITICAL INTERESTS OF THE PRO-SOVIET
COMPRADORS, HEADED BY LIN PIAO.
According to the biographer
of Mao's wife, Chiang Ching,
"Even before
the lines of Cultural Revolution began to be drawn in 1965, the Chairman
was a foe of Lin Piao. Contradictions between them were already evident".
(Roxane Witke: op. cit.; p.
311).
and Chiang Ching herself told Witke
that:
"During the Cultural Revolution,
the 'Lin Piao clique' . commissioned two groups of people to search
for materials that could be used against her (in the power struggle)".
(Roxane Witke: ibid.; p. 59).
Furthermore, having been called
upon to intervene in the 'Cultural Revolution', the People's Liberation
Army emerged from it with greatly increased
power:
"During the Cultural Revolution,
the power of the Army grew to unprecedented proportions as the PLA was
called on . . . to intervene to impose military control.
. . . Later, in the reorganised Party committees,
the military continued to play the dominant organisational role".
(Kau Ying-mao & Pierre M.
Perrolle: 'The Politics of Lin Piao's Abortive Military Coup', in:
'Asian Survey', Volume 14, No. 6 (June 1974); p. 560).
The Rift within the Party (1970-71)
The contradiction between the
two comprador bourgeois groupings within the Party showed itself particularly
in:
"Disagreements inside
the Party leadership over foreign policy".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,437).
Firstly, in September 1970
the pro-US faction pressed for a Fourth Five-Year Plan which involved:
"A massive programme for the
mechanisation of agriculture",
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,437).
to be financed:
"By reducing expenditure on
the armed forces".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,437).
this reduction to be made possible
by bringing about:
"A detente with the United States".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,437).
The pro-Soviet faction of the Party,
headed by Lin Piao, naturally
"opposed the policy of detente
with the United States."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,437).
Secondly,
in December 1970 a movement began for:
"The revival of the provincial
Party committees",
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,437).
a movement strongly:
"Opposed by Marshal Lin and
a section of the Army leadership".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,437).
since it:
". . threatened the Army's political
ascendancy."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,437).
Mao himself is on record as telling
French Foreign Minister Maurice SCHUMANN* and Sri Lankan Prime Minister
Sirimavo BANDARANAIKE* that Lin:
". . broke ranks
with the leadership on a number of domestic and foreign issues, including
the decision to seek a normalisation of relations with the United States."
('New York Times', 28 July 1972;
p. 2),
and that:
"Another policy opposed by Mr.
Lin was the move to rebuild the Communist Party apparatus, which
had been shattered by the Cultural Revolution".
('New York Times', 28 July 1972;
p. 2).
Thus, by the beginning of 1971:
"A certain ambiguity became
apparent . . . in the Chinese attitude towards the United
States. While violent opposition to American intervention in Asia continued
to be voiced, Edgar SNOW* and several other Western mediators
were sounding out Washington's readiness to establish a dialogue".
(Jaap van Ginneken: op. cit.;
p. 244).
In initiating these approaches to
the US imperialists, the grouping headed by Mao:
". . was supported by
Chou En-lai, though Lin Piao remained opposed to it."
(Jaap van Ginneken: ibid.; p.
244).
"The more radical faction in
China, led by Lin Piao, vigorously opposed the prospect of detente".
(Michael Schaller: 'The
United States and China in the Twentieth Century'; Oxford; 1990; p. 185).
This opposition to rapprochement
with US imperialism was denounced by its supporters as
"'ultra-leftism'".
(Dennis Woodward: 'Political
Power and Gun Barrels: The Role of the PLA', in: Bill Brugger (Ed.): op.
cit.; p. 88).
The 2nd Plenum of the 9th CC
(August/September 1970)
At the 2nd Plenum of the 9th
Central Committee, held at Lushan in August/September 970, the
struggle between the two main current groupings within the Party
-- between that representing the interests of the pro-American compradors
and that representing the interests of the pro-Soviet compradors -- emerged
into the open.
The Plenum:
". . was a particularly
lengthy one".
(Jaap van Ginneken: op. cit.;
p. 206).
Lin Piao and his supporters:
"Were reported to have been
responsible for having the original agenda of the session amended
in such a way that Chen Po-ta could place the question of the Presidency
on the new agenda".
(Jaap van Ginneken: ibid.; p.
217).
the State Presidency having:
"Remained vacant . . since
Liu Shao-chi was removed from it during the Cultural Revolution."
(Dennis Woodward: op. cit.;
p. 80).
At the Plenum:
"A movement developed .
. . to solve the problem of the Presidency immediately,
by pressing Mao to accept. . . . Chen Po-ta
delivered a seemingly unprepared speech on the subject of the Presidency.
. . . He then proposed spontaneously to nominate Mao as President".
(Jaap van Ginneken: op. cit.;
p. 215).
The proposal was accompanied by
criticism of those -- particularly Chou En-lai -- who were
alleged to have deleted from the draft State Constitution the position
of State Chairman and a provision extolling Mao as a' genius':
"The 'surprise attack' contained
in speeches by Lin Piao, Chen Po-ta and other top military leaders was
directed at those (Chou En-lai in particular) who, in drawing up
the new State Constitution, had deleted the post of Chairman and
a provision extolling the 'genius' of Mao Tse-tung".
(Philip Bridgham: 'The
Fall of Lin Piao' (hereafter listed as 'Philip Bridgham (1973)'),
in: 'China Quarterly', No. 55 (July/September 1973); p. 434-35).
But the manoeuvre:
"Backfired when Mao rejected
both the proposal for a State Chairman . . . and the view of 'genius' which
Lin and Chen had propounded in their speeches".
(Philip Bridgham (1973): ibid.;
p. 435).
As Mao insisted later:
"I don't want
to be state chairman. I have said this six times already".
(Mao Tse-tung: 'Summary of Chairman
Mao's Talks with Responsible Comrades at Various Places during
his Provincial Tour' (August/September 1971), in: Stuart Schram (Ed.)
(1975): op. cit.; p. 294-95).
The real aim of the manoeuvre, however,
was to nominate Lin Piao to the vacant post after Mao had once again declined
nomination:
"Lin, through his supporters,
attempted to reappoint Mao to the position of Chairman (President -- Ed.)
of the People's Republic. . Lin 's supporters, led by Chen
Po-ta, knowing that Mao would decline the position, hoped that by
this tactic, Lin would be appointed to the revived post".
(Dennis Woodward: op. cit.;
p. 80).
If this manoeuvre had been successful,
Lin would have come to hold the influential post of State President, while
he:
"Would also have become Party
Chairman in the event of Mao's death, while still remaining commander-in-chief
of the army."
(Jaap van Ginneken: op. cit.:
p. 215-16).
But Mao saw through the manoeuvre
as a hypocritical attempt to organise a
coup d'etat:
"At the 1970 Lushan Conference
they made a surprise attack and carried out underground activity.
. . . They caused trouble . . . for . . . two days and a half. .
. . This kind of behaviour shows that they had some aim in mind.
. . Their programme was to appoint a state chairman,
and to extol 'genius'. . . A certain person was anxious to become state
chairman, to split the Party and to seize power. . .
. I am no genius. . . . I wrote 'Some Opinions' which specially criticises
the genius theory. . We should not appoint a state chairman.
. . . Chen Po-ta . . . gave the appearance of meaning to establish my prestige.
But when you get to the bottom of it, he really meant himself".
(Mao Tse-tung: 'Summary of Chairman
Mao's Talks with Responsible Comrades at Various Places during
his Provincial Tour' (August/September 1971), in: Stuart Schram (Ed.)
(1975): Op. cit.; p. 292, 293, 294-95).
Later, at the 10th National
Congress of the CPC in August 1973, Chou En lai characterised the events
at the 2nd Plenum bluntly as an 'aborted
coup':
"Lin Piao . . .
went further to start a . . coup d'etat, which was aborted,
at the 2nd. Plenary Session of the 9th Central Committee in August
1970".
(Chou En-lai: 'Report
to the 10th National Congress of the CPC' (August 1973), in:
'The 10th National Congress of the CPC (Documents)'; Peking; 1973; p. 5-6).
As a result, at the Plenum:
"Chen Po-ta had to face
a full-scale attack. His whole political career was closely
examined, bringing reproaches of ultra-Left deviationism.
. . . He was finally deposed . . . from his position as a member of the
Standing Committee and, obviously, from the position
of propaganda chief".
(Jaap van Ginneken: op. cit.;
p. 216).
Significantly, it was Lin Piao:
"who resisted Chen's dismissal
longest".
(Jaap van Ginneken: ibid.; p.
217).
The Moves to Weaken Lin
Piao's Base of Support (September 1970 - January 1971)
With the conclusion of
the 2nd Plenum, the pro-US comprador grouping of the Party:
"Was determined to undermine
Lin' s power base so as to stall off an attempt to seize power".
(Wu Tien-wei: 'Lin Piao
and the Gang of Four: Contra-Confucianism in Historical and Intellectual
Perspective'; Carbondale (USA); 1983; p. 17).
Immediately following the 2nd Plenum,
Chen Po-ta:
"was taken into custody in September
1970".
(Wu Tien-wei: ibid.; p. 17).
and:
". a campaign to criticise Chen
Po-ta and to oppose 'idealism and metaphysics' followed immediately after
the end of the plenum."
(Dennis Woodward: op. cit.;
p. 80).
However, because of Lin Piao's wider
and stronger power base,
"Mao was compelled . .
. to resort to indirect tactics to undermine Lin's base of power
in the Army".
(Philip Bridgham (1973): op.
cit.; p. 435).
justifying these tactics by the
'need for unity':
"We have shielded Vice-Chairman
Lin and have not drawn conclusions concerning an individual.
. . . We still want to protect Lin. No matter who it is who has made mistakes,
it is not a good thing to forget unity".
(Mao Tse-tung: 'Summary of Chairman
Mao's Talks with Responsible Comrades at Various Places during
his Provincial Tour' (August/September 1972), in: Stuart Schram (Ed.)
(1975): p. 294).
Instead, the political representatives
of the pro-US compradors took indirect steps to weaken the power base of
Lin and his fellow-conspirators:
"In the months following the
plenum moves were taken to undermine Lin Piao's base
of support as a prelude to his eventual demotion or dismissal.
These moves . . . embraced the launching of a campaign
to criticise Chen Po-ta and to oppose arrogance and conceit within the
PLA.. . . In January 1971, the Peking Military Region was thoroughly reorganised".
(Dennis Woodward: op. cit.; p. 80).
And at an Enlarged Politburo Conference
at Peitaiho in December 1970:
"Lin's closest supporters .
. . who had championed his cause at the 2nd Plenum, were criticised".
(Dennis Woodward: op. cit.;
p. 80).
The Plan for a Coup (March 1971)
Following their setback
at the 2nd Plenum in August/September 1970, in March 1971,
according to Chou En-lai's report to the 10th National Congress of the
CPC in August 1973, Lin Piao -- together with his wife Yeh Chun and
his son Lin Ki-kuo, who was Deputy Director of Operations of the Air Force:
"drew up the plan for an armed
. . . coup d'etat entitled 'Outline of Project 571"'.
(Chou En-lai: 'Report
to the 10th National Congress of the CPC' (August 1973), in: 'The 10th
National Congress of the CPC (Documents)'; op. cit.; p. 6).
'Project 571':
"Envisaged a military coup based
on Air Force and Army support; Soviet pressure on the frontier; the
arrest of Chairman Mao; . . . and the murder of the conspirators'
other opponents in the Party leadership".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,635).
A leading Chinese official told
Scandinavian journalists in November 1972:
"That Marshal Lin had offered
to cede large areas of Chinese territory to the Soviet Union in return
for its support".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,635).
In July 1972, Mao confirmed
to French Foreign Minister Maurice Schumann and Sri Lankan Prime Minister
Sirimavo Bandaranaike:
"that Mr. Lin had plotted to
assassinate him as part of a conspiracy aimed at replacing the civilian
leadership of China with a military dictatorship".
(Mao Tse-tung: Statement
of July 1972, in: 'New York Times', 28 July 1972;
p. 1)
by bombing his train while he was
on an inspection tour:
"Lin had arranged to blow up
the train somewhere north of Nanking".
(Wilfred Burchett: 'Lin Piao's
Plot: The Full Story', in: 'Far Eastern Economic Review', Volume 81, No.
33 (20 August 1973); p. 23).
Lin Piao's Flight (September
1971)
However, Lin Tou-tou:
"Daughter of Lin Piao,
. . . reported the situation to the premier (Chou En-lai
-- Ed.) in time, which led to the foiling of her father's monstrous conspiracy".
('Top Secret Communique of CC
of CPC concerning Lin Piao's 1'September 12" Anti-Party Incident' (September
1971), in: Michael Y. M. Kau (Ed.): 'The Lin Piao Affair: Power
Politics and Military Coup'; White Plains (USA); 1975; p. 70).
During the three days 13-15 September
1971:
"All internal air flights were
halted, . . . and . . the Air Force remained almost completely
grounded for some time".
('Keesing 's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,438),
while:
"The preparations for the annual
mass procession . . . on 1 October were cancelled".
(Jaap van Ginneken: ibid.; p.
20).
In addition, a number of high-ranking
Army and Air Force officers were arrested, while:
"During the following months
. . . the number of arrests began to run into hundreds".
(Jaap van Ginneken: op. cit.;
p. 283).
At the end of September 1971,
the government of the People's Republic of Mongolia issued a statement
declaring that:
"During the night of Sept. 13
a jet aircraft belonging to the Chinese People's Republic violated
the air space of the Mongolian People's Republic . . and .
. . crashed. . . . The semi-carbonised bodies of nine persons,
a firearm, documents and equipment proving that the aircraft belonged
to the Chinese Air Force were found on the scene of the catastrophe". ('Keesing
's Contemporary Archives', Volume 18; p. 25,438).
In December 1971, public attacks
on Lin Piao began to appear in the Chinese press:
"in the innuendo of .
. . 'Liu Shao-chi and his kind of swindler'".
(Wu Tien-wei: op. cit.; p. 20).
But not until the summer of 1972
was any official Chinese statement made on these events. In July 1972,
as has been said, Mao Tse-tung told French Foreign Minister Maurice Schumann
and Sri Lankan Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranaike:
"That Mr. Lin had plotted
to assassinate him as part of a conspiracy aimed at replacing
the civilian leadership of China with a military dictatorship. . . . When
the plot failed, he (Lin -- Ed.) and certain of his followers commandeered
a plane and 'tried to escape' to the Soviet Union; the plane crashed and
they were killed".
('New York Times', 28 July 1972;
p.1; 2).
In July 1972, the Chinese Embassy
in Algiers:
"Officially confirmed that Mr.
Lin had died in a plane crash in Mongolia . . . while fleeing to the Soviet
Union".
('New York Times', 29 July 1972;
p. 7).
An Ad Hoc Investigation Committee
was set up by the Central Committee of the CPC:
"To conduct the investigation
into the Lin Piao-Chen Po-ta anti-Party clique".
('Resolution of CC of the CDC
concerning the Lin-Chen Anti-Party Clique', (1971), in: Michael Y. M. Kau
(Ed.): op. cit.; p. 74).
The Moves for Rapprochement with
US Imperialism (1970-76)
After the setback received by
the political representatives of the pro-Soviet compradors, headed
by Lin Piao, at the Lushan Plenum in August/September 1979, and particularly
after the frustration of Lin Piao's attempted coup in September 1971, moves
towards a Sino-US rapprochement developed quickly. In
November 1970, American proposals for improving relations between the USA
and China were:
"conveyed to Mr. Chou En-lai
. . . by the Romanian government."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,437).
and in December 1970:
"Chairman Mao told the American
journalist Mr. Edgar Snow that he would like to meet President NIXON*,
and that it would be made clear in the coming months
that it was not the Army which wielded power in China."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 25,437).
In April 1971:
"after a six-year absence from
international competitions, the People's Republic of China competed
in the world table tennis championships."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 24,645).
and:
"When the American table-tennis
players arrived in Peking, the group received VIP treatment. . .
. They were received personally by Chou En-lai".
(Jaap van Ginneken: op. cit.;
p. 244).
Who told them:
"Your visit to China on
invitation has opened the door to friendly contacts between the people
of the two countries."
(Chou En-lai: Statement
to Visiting US Table-Tennis Team (April 1971), in: Jaap van Ginneken:
ibid.; p. 244).
In July 1971, following a secret
visit to China by US diplomat Henry KISSINGER*, the 'People's Daily' announced:
"Knowing of President
Nixon's expressed desire to visit the People's Republic of China,
Premier Chou En-lai . . . has extended an invitation to President
Nixon to visit China". (Jaap van Ginneken: ibid.; p.
250, citing 'People's Daily' (15 July 1971).
In August 1971, US Secretary of
State William ROGERS* announced that:
"The United States would support
the admission of the People's Republic of China to the United Nations."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 18; p. 24,765).
In February 1972, US President Richard
Nixon and a large entourage landed in Peking, Premier Chou En-lai
headed the welcoming party, and Nixon was received by Mao Tse-tung the
same day. At dinner, Nixon said:
"Let us start a Long March together".
(Richard Nixon: Speech
at Peking Dinner (February 1972), in: Jaap van Ginneken : op. cit.; p.
295).
In November 1972, on Nixon's
orders,
"The 22-year-old restrictions
on travel to China by US ships and aircraft were lifted".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 19; p. 25,684).
In February 1973, Dr. Henry
Kissinger, Nixon's Special Assistant for National Security Affairs, arrived
in Peking for a 5-day visit, during which:
"the two countries . . . agreed
. . . to establish a liaison office in each other's capitals". ('Keesing
's Contemporary Archives', Volume 19; p. 25,837).
In November 1973, Dr. Henry Kissinger,
now US Secretary of State, made:
"a five-day visit to Peking."
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 20; p. 26,316).
In August 1975, American columnist
Jack ANDERSON* reported that:
"Chairman Mao Tse-tung had invited
him (Nixon -- Ed.) to visit China."
('New York Times', 14 August
1975; p. 19).
In December 1975, US President
Gerald FORD* and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger visited Peking.
('Keesing's Contemporary
Archives', Volume 22; p. 27,557).
Sino-US Rapprochement in World
Affairs (1971-76)
The rapprochement
between the US and the PRC was reflected in the latter throwing
off its false 'anti-imperialist' mask in international affairs.
This was seen in Chinese
support for the strengthening of NATO:
"The Communist Chinese leadership
. . . promoted the strengthening of the NATO alliance";
(A. James Gregor: 'The
China Connection: US Policy and the People's Republic of China'; Stanford
(USA); 1986; p. 90).
in Chinese support
for German reunification and West European integration:
"China is the world's
most consistent advocate of German reunification and West European integration";
('Economist', Volume 257, No.
6,898 (8 November 1975); p. 59).
in Chinese support
for the US-Japanese 'Security Treaty'. After
1972:
"Peking ceased its criticism
of the US-Japan Mutual Security Treaty. The Communist Chinese leadership
. . . actively encouraged the security relationship between
Tokyo and Washington";
(A. James Gregor: op. cit.;
p. 90).
in declining
Chinese support for genuine national liberation movements:
"With the termination of the
war in Vietnam, Communist Chinese support for insurrectionary movements
in South-East Asia rapidly declined";
(A. James Gregor: ibid.; p.
90).
by 1975, the PRC had:
"Become a champion of stability
in the Persian Gulf region. It had . . . gradually
disassociated itself from the national liberation movements in the region".
(A. James Gregor: ibid.; p.
91).
in Chinese support for semi-colonies
of imperialist powers, such as imperial Iran, Pakistan, Zaire, fascist
Chile and the Philippines:
In January 1971, the Chinese
government declared:
"The Government of People's
Republic of China firmly supports the Imperial Government of Iran in its
just struggle to safeguard national independence and state sovereignty".
('Peking Review', Volume 14, No. 34 (20 August 1971); p. 4).
"After the proclamation of Bangla
Desh as an independent nation, China refused to recognise it as it had
affected the integrity of Pakistan. China opposed the consideration of
Bangla Desh's application for UN membership. China offered so much aid
to Pakistan that the latter occupied the first place on the list of recipients
of Chinese economic aid. From 1965 to 1973 Pakistan received from China
$445.7 million of economic aid".
(R. S. Chavan: 'Chinese
Foreign Policy: The Chou En-lai Era'; New Delhi; 1979; p. 85-86).
During a visit
to China in January 1973 by President Sese MOBUTU* of Zaire
(now the 'Democratic Republic of Congo) at the
invitation of the Chinese government, Premier Chou En-lai declared:
"The Chinese government
supports the just positions of the Government of Zaire", ('Keesing 's Contemporary
Archives', Volume 19; p. 25,751).
and:
"offered Zaire a big loan of
$115 millions".
(R. S. Chavan: op. cit.; p.
198).
In October 1973, the Chinese government
informed the Ambassador of the Chilean military junta:
"that she no longer recognised
him as Santiago's representative, in a move viewed in diplomatic circles
as de facto recognition of the new Chilean military junta".
('New York Times', 12 October
1973; p. 3),
In June 1975, at a banquet in honour
of visiting Philippines President Ferdinand MARCOS*, Chinese Deputy
Premier Teng Hsaio-ping praised the Philippine government's:
"Unremitting efforts to safeguard
national independence and defend state sovereignty".
('Keesing's Contemorary Archives',
Volume 21; p. 27,334).
In his reply, Marcos described the
People's Republic of China as:
"The natural leader of the Third
World".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 21; p. 27,334).
The growing Sino-US rapprochement
was also seen in Chinese support for spurious
national liberation movements backed by imperialist powers:
In the 1970s, the 'New
York Times' reported that the US-backed 'National Union for the Total Liberation
of Angola' (UNITA), led by Jonas SAVIMBI*,:
"is supported by China and Zaire."
('New York Times', 12 July 1975;
p. 3).
and that UNITA:
"had acquired Mirage jets --
a French-made aircraft -- and Chinese pilots to fly the planes".
('New York Times', 24 August
1975; p. 2).
The 10th National Congress of
the CPC (August 1973)
In his report to
the 10th National Congress of the CPC, held in August 1973, Chou En-lai
declared that:
"The shattering of the
Lin Piao anti-Party clique is our Party's greatest victory since the 9th
Congress. . . . A movement to criticise Lin
Piao and rectify style of work has been launched throughout the country."
(Chou En-lai: 'Report
to the 10th National Congress of the CPC', (August 1973), in: 'The 10th
National Congress of the CPC (Documents)'; op. cit.; p. 6-7).
And the press communique issued
by the congress reported:
"The congress indignantly denounced
the Lin Piao anti-Party clique for its crimes. All the delegates firmly
supported this resolution: . . .
Expel Lin Piao, the bourgeois
careerist, conspirator, counterrevolutionary double-dealer, renegade
and traitor, from the Party once and for all;
expel Chen Po-ta, principal
member of the Lin Piao anti-Party clique, anti-Communist Kuomintang element,
Trotskyite, renegade, enemy agent and revisionist, from the Party
once and for all, and dismiss him from all posts".
(Press Communique of the 10th
National Congress of the CPC (August 1973), in: 'The 10th National Congress
of the CPC (Documents)'; ibid.; p. 92).
The new Party constitution adopted
at the congress:
"did not vary greatly from the
statutes adopted at the previous congress";
(Jaap van Ginneken: op. cit.;
p. 304).
except that:
"The paragraph concerning Lin
Piao . . . was completely deleted".
(Wang Hung-wen:
'Report on the Revision of the Party Constitution' (August 1973),
in: 'The 10th National Congress of the CPC (Documents)'; op. cit.;
p. 43).
The new Central Committee elected
at the congress:
"Mirrored the decline in 'military'
representation in the Chinese leadership towards pre-Cultural Revolution
levels".
(Dennis Woodward: 'Political
Power and Gun Barrels: The Role of the PLA', in: Bill Brugger (Ed.): op.
cit.; p. 92).
The 4th National People's Congress
(January 1975)
The 4th National People's
Congress met in January 1975, for the first time in ten years:
"The failure to reconvene it
being generally attributed to the political upheaval caused by the Cultural
Revolution".
('Keesing 's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 21; p. 26,965).
The congress:
"Took place in complete secrecy".
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 21; p. 26,965).
It adopted a new Constitition from
which:
"the post of Chairman (President)
of the Republic was abolished",
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 21; p. 26,966).
and appointed a new State Council
(Cabinet), headed by Chou En-lai as Prime Minister.
The Army was not strongly
represented in the new government, there being only one military
officer among the twelve Deputy Premiers.
('Keesing's Contemporary Archives',
Volume 21; p. 26,969).
BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES --10
ANDERSON, Jack N.,
American journalist and missionary (1922- ); reporter,
'Salt Lake City Tribune' (1941-44);
Mormon missionary (1941-44); reporter, 'Washington Merry-go-Round'
(1947- ); editor, 'Parade' (195468).
BANDARANAIKE, Sirimavo
R. D., Sri Lankan politician (1916- ); married
Sri
Lankan politician Solomon
Bandaranaike (1940); president of Sri Lankan Freedom Party
after assassination of husband (1959); Prime Minister
(1960-65, 1970-71); stripped of political rights by parliament
(1980); pardoned (1986).
FORD, Gerald R.,
American lawyer and politician (1913- ); Vice-President
(1973-74); President (1974-77).
KISSINGER,Henry A., German-born
American academic and diplomat (1923- ); to USA (1938);
Assistant Professor of Government, Harvard University (195962); Professor
of Government, Harvard University (1962-69); Presidential Assistant
for National Security Affairs (1969-73);
head, National Security Council (1969-75); Nobel Peace Prize
(1973); Secretary of State (1973-77); Professor of Diplomacy, Georgetown
University (1977- ).
MARCOS, Ferdinand,
Hawaiian-born Filipino lawyer and politician (1917-89); Senator
(1959-66); President of Senate (1963-65); President (1966-86);
fled to USA (1986).
MOBUTU, Sese Seko. Zairean
journalist, military officer and politician (1930); Army Chief
of Staff (1960-65); led military coup
(1965); President (1965-97); field marshal (1982); fled abroad (1997).
NIXON, Richard M, American
lawyer and politician (1913-94); Vice-President (1953-61);
President (1969-74); resigned (1974).
ROGERS, William P.,
American lawyer and diplomat (1913- ); Deputy AttorneyGeneral (1953-57);
Attorney-General (1957-61); US representative to UN General
Assembly (1965); Secretary of State (1969-73).
SAVIMBI, Jonas M.,
Angolan politician (1934- ); formed US/South Africanbacked
National Union for the Total Liberation of Angola (UNITA) (1966);
SCHUMANN, Maurice,
French journalist and politician (1911- ); Minister for Foreign
Affairs (1951-54, 1959, 1969-73); Minister
for Scientific Research (1967-68); Senator (1974- );
Vice-President of Senate (197783).
SNOW, Edgar P., American
journalist and author (1905-72); to China (1928); assistant
editor, 'China Weekly Review' (1929-30);
correspondent, 'Chicago Tribune' (1929-30); correspondent,'Daily
Herald' (1932-39); returned to USA (1941); war correspondent (1942-43),
assistant editor, 'Saturday Evening Post' (1943-51);
special consultant, Harvard University (1956-57);
correspondent, 'Look' (1960-61); correspondent, 'Le Nouveau Candide' (1964-65);
died in Switzerland (1972).
GO TO:
NEXT
PART THIS ARTICLE:
BACK TO TABLE
CONTENTS of "CLASS STRUGGLES IN CHINA"
ON TO Part
2 This Article
OTHER RELEVANT LINKS - ARTICLES
ON CHINA
NOTES ON STALIN & THE COLONIAL QUESTION
IN CHINA By Alliance
Stalin
and China
UPON THE CURRENT SITUATION: OPEN LETTER TO
LUDO MARTENS;
Part
1:
Part
2:
Part
3: